The University Grants Commission (UGC) has drafted a history syllabus for undergraduates that focuses more on Hindu mythology and religious texts and diminishes the importance of Muslim rule.
The changes are already facing allegations of saffronisation and distortion. Since the BJP government came into power at the Centre, it has repeatedly tried to change the syllabus of history textbooks to reflect the view of Hindutva or Sangh Parivar outfits, reported The Telegraph.
Among the readings suggested for papers, works by prominent historians such as R.S. Sharma’s book on ancient India and Irfan Habib’s book on medieval India have been dropped. That books by little-known authors – some of whom are “pro-Sanghis” have been included.
The document says that the curriculum has been designed only as a guiding principle, saying that “justice to the glorious past and vast canvas of Indian History can only be done by providing the much-needed space at micro and macro levels”.
However, the UGC has in the past has only issued general guidelines. This is the first time that the body has drawn up a full-fledged syllabus. The Commission had in the past suggested that universities would be allowed to deviate only 20-30% from the existing syllabus.
The first paper of history (honours) that the document covers is titled ‘Idea of Bharat’, now covers pre-historic times and the early historic period. It includes topics such as ‘Concept of Bharatvarsha’, ‘Eternity of synonyms Bharat’ and ‘The glory of Indian Literature: Ved, Vedanga, Upanishads, Epics, Jain and Buddhist Literature, Smriti, Puranas etc.’
Jeetendra Meena, assistant professor of history at DU’s Shyam Lal College, told the telegraph that the new syllabus glorified religious literature and dropped ancient secular literature such as Kautilya, Arthashastra, the poems of Kalidas and the ayurvedic text Charak Samhita.
The third paper has a topic on the Indus-Saraswati Civilisation, debate on the relationship of Indus, Saraswati civilization and Vedic civilization. The superlative mention of the Saraswati river in Rig Veda has been a subject of scientific curiosity for over a century. The Centre has set up projects for the revival of the mythological Saraswati river.
However, there are still doubts about whether it was actually the Saraswati mentioned in holy texts.
The seventh paper includes a topic on ‘India on the Eve of Babur’s Invasion’, despite the fact that the current Delhi University syllabus shuns the term “invasion”. However, the East India Company’s rule in India has not been termed as an “invasion”. It has been termed as “territorial expansion”, The Telegraph noted.
Under the ‘Society and Economy’ section, the paper has two separate topics on Hindu and Muslim societies, suggesting a division between both in the medieval period. The Telegraph, citing professor Meena, said students have always been taught how these communities co-existed, rather than studying them in isolation.
According to the report, Muslim history between the 13th and 18th centuries has been sidelined in the new syllabus. The current DU syllabus has three papers devoted to this period, while the new syllabus has just one paper.
The document says, “a serious remodeling of medieval period has been done that covers larger portions of India for a better understanding of national history.”
RSS ideologue Sri Prakash Singh, a teacher of political science at DU, told The Telegraph that “previously Mughal history occupied too much space”. It’s not been sidelined but a course correction is being made. There was less content on the kings of south India and other parts. Now they are getting space, he added.
While leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabhbhai Patel and Bhim Rao Ambedkar received less attention in the new draft syllabus, not much importance is given to the subject of communalism in the early 20th century.
References to Dalit politics during the period between 1857 to 1950 is also absent from the new syllabus.
The 1857 uprising against the British is described as the “First War of Independence”, a term coined by Sangh ideologue V.D. Savarkar. It seems to have removed the uprisings that took place before 1857, such as the Sanyasi Rebellion in Bengal, Paika Rebellion in Odisha and the Polygar Rebellion in Tamil Nadu.
There’s also no mention of the 1905 partition of Bengal and the resistance to it.